PROP_DESIGN contains many examples, to help get users started. The included examples relate to the following products:
These products were chosen as PROP_DESIGN examples, because they cover the typical operating range of aircraft propellers. These products were designed, built, and tested prior to the existence of PROP_DESIGN. The PROP_DESIGN example input files are based on information found on the internet. Thus, the PROP_DESIGN example designs may or may not be similar to the actual product designs.
Three additional examples are provided in the reference information folder. The VTOL and Hovercraft examples are intended to show how PROP_DESIGN integrates into vehicle design projects. The examples are described below. The parts in black are where the cargo and/or passengers would go. The modern turbofan example was done out of curiosity and proved to be very enlightening. I believe all PROP_DESIGN users will find this example to be very interesting.
Below is an example of a VTOL aircraft. The ducted fans are shown in light blue. The thrust vectoring nozzles are shown in white. VTOL aircraft will be more efficient than helicopters and quadcopters. They will also be able to travel at much higher speeds. This is due to the air flow into the blades. An axial flow orientation is ideal.
VTOL aircraft are much less efficient than traditional aircraft. All VTOL have a lift-to-thrust ratio of one. Wings made with NACA 65A009 airfoils have a lift-to-thrust (i.e. L/D) ratio of 27.5. So VTOL aircraft should only be used when absolutely necessary.
Below is an application of a diffuser. Moreover, a diffuser was used to create static pressure for the plenum chamber of a hovercraft. The diffuser is shown in gray. The ducted fans are shown in light blue. The plenum chamber is shown in white.
The VTOL and hovercraft examples use the same fans. The hovercraft example uses half the fans of the VTOL example (3 out of 6 fans). Thus, the hovercraft example uses half the power of the VTOL example. The hovercraft example can lift 4.33x the weight of the VTOL example, while only using 25% of the thrust (1 out of 4 fans). This comes with one major limitation, hovercrafts can only float inches above the ground.
The hovercraft example has a lift-to-thrust ratio of 17.3. Traditional aircraft are more efficient than hovercraft. Wings made with NACA 65A009 airfoils have a lift-to-thrust (i.e. L/D) ratio of 27.5. Traditional aircraft are about as efficient as a typical car or truck. Cars and trucks have a lift-to-thrust ratio of 33.3.
I use PROP_DESIGN to study modern turbofans. This stemmed from the newly created flying wing concept. I wanted to see what sort of ducted fans I could create using PROP_DESIGN. Below are pictures of an optimized ducted fan design that could be used on typical transport aircraft or the flying wing concept I posted recently. It was modeled in Rhino and rendered in Keyshot. It has a cruise efficiency of 91.4% at Mach .7 32,000 feet. It makes 26,843 lbf of thrust at takeoff. The cruise thrust is 3,514 lbf. Using four engines, the aircraft could have 14,056 lbf of drag at the cruise condition. Power at cruise for all four engines would be 19,296 shp. Power at takeoff for all four engines would be 118,543 shp. Fan efficiency at takeoff is 67.5%. Volumetric flow rate at takeoff is 1,652,930.68 cfm for one engine. Volumetric flow rate at cruise is 1,012,594.6 cfm for one engine. There are 22 straight blades with a diameter of 111 inches. As always, NACA 65A009 airfoils are used, due to their excellent transonic performance. To maximize thrust the radius/chord ratio is 2, rather than the typical value of 10. This yields about 5x the thrust while maintaining the same efficiency. The use of a duct adds about 20% thrust with a slight boost in efficiency. The nose cone was arbitrarily drawn. In reality, CFD would be used to design the inlet. PROP_DESIGN only looks at the fan itself. There is a lot more information contained in the download, I don't want to duplicate information, and spoil the conclusions.